[Next] [Previous] [Up] [Top] [Contents]

4. Internal and External Conceptions of `context'

4.1. The internal approach


We can refer to the context as that which an individual (or group of individuals) actually uses as a result of their learning. This has the disadvantage that different individuals or groups will develop different constructs as a result of their circumstances and the heuristics they happen to use. On the other hand these can be empirically investigated.

It is not clear that the contextual mechanism that an individual uses to remember and recognise a situation will be best represented by symbolic inference. For it may be that one such `context' isn't clearly separable from another. Deciding which context is relevant may be more of a process of recognition than an inferential process. If this is the case the recognition might be better modelled by something like a neural network than using a logic-based system. It may be that there isn't sufficient continuity for the results of the recognition process to be meaningfully ascribed separate identities. But even if this is the case, it does not mean that it is useful for us to analyse and model these mechanisms using computational, symbolic or other reified terms.


The Pragmatic Roots of Context - Bruce Edmonds - 31 MAR 99
[Next] [Previous] [Up] [Top] [Contents]

Generated with CERN WebMaker