Yes , good and necessary point. I meant this statement to refer to how we
model our external environment, e.g., what we think "rocks" are. Even there
we may have some disagreement, but that is the case I am referring to.
At 02:43 PM 2/11/99 -0800, you wrote:
.....Our minds have very few alternatives to usual time/space
>> concepts for reference, making it hard to think in other terms.
>> >
>
>I can't fully agree with this last sentence John. ...
>our minds can also dwell in imaginary and symbolic realms where
>time and location are of little or no consequence....
>Norm
-----------------------------------------------
John J. Kineman, Physical Scientist/Ecologist
National Geophysical Data Center
325 Broadway E/GC1 (3100 Marine St. Rm: A-152)
Boulder, Colorado 80303 USA
(303) 497-6900 (phone)
(303) 497-6513 (fax)
jjk@ngdc.noaa.gov (email)