At 10:07 PM 6/9/98 +0000, you wrote:
>Dear Alexei,
>You asked whether Maturana means 'medium'as physical environment or as
>internal model of the world developed by the animals etc.
>
>Perhaps neither, I think. As I understand it, is the concept of medium
>in a sense
>prior to the distinction between objective (physical) world
>and subjective (internal) model of it. IN a sense, I
>read it as comparable to Merleau-Ponty's concept of 'Flesh'
>(I am not sure if you like that one!;-))
>
>Here is a passage from Maturana, 1987, p. 340; perhaps
>you may come to an entirely different interpretation than
>I do!:
>
>"I call medium of a unity the containing background of
>distinctions, including all that is not involved in its
>structure if it is a composite one, (.....) in which it realizes its
>domain of existence. The medium includes both that part of the background
>that is distinguished by the observer as surrounding
>the unity, and that part of the background the observer
>conceives as interacting with it, and which it obscures in its
>operation in structural coupling (in its domain of existence).
>I call this latter part of the medium oeprationally defined
>moment by moment in its encounter with the medium
>in structural coupling, the _niche_ of the unity.
>Accordingly, a unity continuously realizes and specifies its
>niche by actually operating in its domain of perturbations
>while conserving adaptation in the medium."
>
>
>Best wishes,
>Arno Goudsmit
>
>
-----------------------------------------------
John J. Kineman, Physical Scientist/Ecologist
National Geophysical Data Center
325 Broadway E/GC1 (3100 Marine St. Rm: A-152)
Boulder, Colorado 80303 USA
(303) 497-6900 (phone)
(303) 497-6513 (fax)
jjk@ngdc.noaa.gov (email)
(303) 497-6513 (fax)