>
> Maybe you need to know about the distictions he makes in lamarckian,
> teilhardian, bergsonian and darwinianevolutionary theories. But in that case
I
> must refer to his thesis, or you must be very interested, then i can
> try to summarize.
>
> Anyway, that was the reason for my question.
>
This is an interesting question in light of complexity theories.
To make sense out of these paragraphs, we do indeed need to know the
distinctions the author has created between the concepts described by
Lamarck, (de Chardin?), Bergson and Darwin.
Could you give your interpretation?
Jerry LR Chandler
"As simple as possible, but not simpler!"