> What does any of this have to do with organic life?
hmmmmmmm. Don, you write very well, and i'm still wading through your
thermodynamics/med application book. i'll try this: there's life -
organic life, and what looks like inorganic life. and a relative
near term future when inorganic life will be much more obvious. i
don't mind being confused over organic or inorganic life, and
modeling/simulations with inorganic life may be as useful as any
other technology.
Why broaden the
> use of a word we've had the devil of a time defining in the first
> place.
ok. but broadening the use of a word is a useful practice - and you
can move on to a new term (like inorganic life or artificial life)
after some people point out your confusing the issue.
On the otherhand, if all material systems are alive, the
> problem goes away, I guess.
this may be true. and provide a useful way to quantify based on a
composit measurement refered to as life.
> Best wishes, Don Mikulecky
>
>
oops. work break.
yours in haste and government downsizing,
mrc
Mark Chandler
U. S. Bureau of Mines
5629 Minnehaha Ave., S.
Minneapolis, MN
55417-3099
USA
office: 612-725-4737
fax: 612-725-4526
chandler@tcrca.usbm.gov