Re: Waves are viruses?

DON MIKULECKY (MIKULECKY@VCUVAX.BITNET)
Sat, 17 Jun 1995 09:32:25 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Search archive
Next message: DON MIKULECKY: "Report on French Society for Theoretical Biology Annual Meeting"
Previous message: DON MIKULECKY: "Re: subjective and objective"
Maybe in reply to: Onar Aam: "Waves are viruses?"
Next in thread: Mark R. Chandler: "Re: Waves are viruses?"

Don Mikulecky
Now I have to ask, "for what purpose" when you suggest waves are viruses.
Then we need to add language like organic/non-organic to the concept of
virus. We already have the words "waves" and "viruses" and their
definitions in a more limited context. Why not simply speak
metaphorically rather than ontologically?

Next message: DON MIKULECKY: "Report on French Society for Theoretical Biology Annual Meeting"
Previous message: DON MIKULECKY: "Re: subjective and objective"
Maybe in reply to: Onar Aam: "Waves are viruses?"
Next in thread: Mark R. Chandler: "Re: Waves are viruses?"